NATCOM
Vibration diagnosis and alignment

Lower paper-mill vibration after alignment and tightening

Abnormal vibration in paper-mill machinery led to a temporary monitoring assessment. Misalignment and structural looseness were identified. After precision alignment and bolt tightening, the recorded vibration fell from 6.356 to 1.114 mm/s RMS, giving the team a measured check of the correction.

Paper-mill machinery
Mechanical alignment
Vibration verification
Paper-mill drive equipment with vibration readings marked at measurement points
Vibration readings across the paper-mill drive helped identify misalignment and structural looseness.
6.356 → 1.114 mm/s RMSMisalignment and looseness identifiedCorrection verified by measurement

01 / The challenge

Find the mechanical cause of the vibration.

A paper mill needed to investigate abnormal vibration in a fixed-speed machine. Measurements across the drive showed different vibration levels, with one point standing out from the surrounding readings. The question was which mechanical condition required attention.

Temporary monitoring gave the assessment a defined focus. A Twave T8-L system and accelerometers recorded the vibration, with a load input included in the setup. The investigation identified two faults to address: misalignment and structural looseness.

02 / The approach

Connect the diagnosis to specific corrective work.

  1. Measure the abnormal vibration

    A temporary T8-L Turbomachinery installation collected vibration measurements using accelerometers. The setup also included a static load input. The equipment photograph identifies measurement points across the drive and shows where the higher vibration occurred.

  2. Identify the mechanical faults

    The assessment identified misalignment and structural looseness. These findings directed the work toward the alignment of the machinery and the security of its mechanical connections.

  3. Correct and measure again

    Precision alignment and bolt tightening addressed the diagnosed faults. The follow-up vibration reading provided a direct check of the machine's response to that work.

03 / The documented outcome

Vibration fell after alignment and bolt tightening.

The initial overall vibration-velocity gauge showed 6.356 mm/s RMS, while the equipment photograph marks point 6A at the rounded value of 6.36 mm/s RMS. Following precision alignment and bolt tightening, the final readout for point 6A showed 1.114 mm/s RMS.

Both values are vibration velocity in millimetres per second, expressed as root mean square, or RMS. Keeping the same measurement type and units makes the before-and-after change clear.

Before correction
6.356 mm/s RMS
After correction
1.114 mm/s RMS
Faults identified
Misalignment and structural looseness
Corrective work
Precision alignment and bolt tightening

04 / Applying the findings

Include verification in the alignment job.

For another machine, start with the vibration history, operating speed and load, recent maintenance and the condition of the supports and connections. A vibration monitoring assessment should identify the likely fault and the evidence needed to choose the corrective work.

When misalignment and looseness occur together, define the work for both conditions. An alignment service should include a clear measurement plan before and after correction. Record where and how the readings are taken, together with the operating conditions, so the comparison can be interpreted.

Use the post-work result as the starting point for follow-up monitoring. The sampling interval should fit how quickly the fault can develop and how the machine can be accessed. Our guide to monitoring between routine vibration rounds explains that decision for machines where conditions change quickly.

Investigate vibration before choosing the repair

Send the machine details, vibration history, operating speed and load, and recent maintenance records. NATCOM can scope the diagnosis, alignment work and measurements needed to verify the correction.